25 Sep 2026
Neta·Resume
Rahul Gandhi dissented: Asked that the decision wait for the Supreme Court hearing two days later, objected to the Chief Justice's removal from the panel in a dissent note, and did not take part in further proceedings. He published the note the next day.
Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury dissented: Recorded dissent on procedure: 212 names sent the night before and a six-name shortlist eight to ten minutes before the meeting. He said he had nothing against the two appointees. source ↗ response ↗
Education: B.Tech Civil Engineering, IIT Kanpur; Business Finance, ICFAI; Environmental Economics, HIID, Harvard University - per ECI profile
The source lists these without dates. They appear in the source's order.
The President appoints the CEC and ECs on the recommendation of a selection committee: the Prime Minister (chair), the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha (or leader of the largest opposition party), and a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime Minister. An appointment is not invalid because of a vacancy or defect in the committee. This replaced the Chief Justice of India, whom the Supreme Court had placed on the interim committee.
PRS analysed the bill as introduced. In the Act as passed, pay was changed from the Cabinet Secretary's to a Supreme Court judge's (Section 10); the panel (Section 7) and the Secretary-rank eligibility rule (Section 5) were not changed.
See all charges and answers →Section 7 of the 2023 Act sets the panel as the Prime Minister, a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime Minister, and the Leader of Opposition.
See all charges and answers →The dissent turns on the change in the selection panel. The record documents the panel set by the Anoop Baranwal judgment until Parliament legislated (PM, Leader of Opposition, CJI) and the panel set by Section 7 of the 2023 Act (PM, Leader of Opposition, a Cabinet Minister nominated by the PM).
See all charges and answers →