25 Sep 2026
Neta·Resume
Rahul Gandhi dissented: Asked that the decision wait for the Supreme Court hearing two days later, objected to the Chief Justice's removal from the panel in a dissent note, and did not take part in further proceedings. He published the note the next day.
Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury dissented: Recorded dissent on procedure: 212 names sent the night before and a six-name shortlist eight to ten minutes before the meeting. He said he had nothing against the two appointees. source ↗ response ↗
Education: B.Tech Civil Engineering, IIT Kanpur; Business Finance, ICFAI; Environmental Economics, HIID, Harvard University - per ECI profile
The source lists these without dates. They appear in the source's order.
PTI reported that INDIA bloc parties were drafting a fresh removal notice for both Houses, likely to be submitted the following week, citing the reported objections of the two Election Commissioners. The April notice might be withdrawn to make way for it.
Based on unnamed opposition sources. Business Standard (25 Sep 2026) notes the removal procedure mirrors that for a Supreme Court judge (Article 324(5) with 124(4)).