17 Nov 2025
Neta·ResumeSpecial Revision — a different exercise from the Special Intensive Revision run in other States. Its figures are shown here but kept out of the SIR comparisons.
| Stage | Electors | As of | Source | Tier | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draft roll | 2,52,01,624 | 2025-12-27 | Assam's Special Revision (not SIR): 2.43 lakh dropped between draft and final |
A draft roll is not the final roll — names still return through claims and appeals.
The draft roll is published after enumeration. Names left off it can come back through claims and objections, and new electors are added, before the final roll is published. So the share left off the draft is usually larger than the net change from the pre-SIR roll to the final roll. Where a final roll isn't in the record yet, only the draft measure can be shown.
Figures run to Sep 2026. Several final rolls were still pending then.
This is Assam's ordinary Special Revision, a different exercise from the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) run in the other states above -- it is not numbered as an SIR phase and 'phase' is left null. The final roll dropped 2,43,485 names between draft and final; final excludes 63,269 service voters, counted separately. Do not treat this as SIR phase data.
| TIER 3 · PRESS |
| — |
| Final roll | 2,49,58,139 | 2026-02-10 | Assam's Special Revision (not SIR): 2.43 lakh dropped between draft and final | TIER 3 · PRESS | — |
Every bar starts at zero. Differences are simple subtraction of the cited figures. A computed stage's method is in its note.
The Commission said written notes and differing views among its members are standard deliberation before decisions, that Commissioners' suggestions were for improving processes, and that all its decisions over the past year, including the SIR, were unanimous decisions of the full Commission. It said ECINET runs under strict security and audit controls and that EROs and DEOs exercise their statutory powers of registration and deletion.
Signed by P. Pawan, Deputy Director. The note does not deal with the specific objections on Form 6, ERONet access, the 28 July work allocation order or the West Bengal appeals.
The Commission's reply says its decisions were unanimous. Section 18 of the 2023 Act sets when unanimity is required and when a majority decides.
See all charges and answers →The Supreme Court's judgment of 27 May 2026 concerned the Bihar SIR; it held that exercise traceable to Section 21(3) of the RP Act, 1950.
See all charges and answers →Section 18 of the 2023 Act sets how the three members decide: allocation of work only by unanimous decision, other business unanimously as far as possible, otherwise by majority.
See all charges and answers →