17 Nov 2025
Neta·ResumeSpecial Revision — a different exercise from the Special Intensive Revision run in other States. Its figures are shown here but kept out of the SIR comparisons.
| Stage | Electors | As of | Source | Tier | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draft roll | 2,52,01,624 | 2025-12-27 | Assam's Special Revision (not SIR): 2.43 lakh dropped between draft and final |
A draft roll is not the final roll — names still return through claims and appeals.
The draft roll is published after enumeration. Names left off it can come back through claims and objections, and new electors are added, before the final roll is published. So the share left off the draft is usually larger than the net change from the pre-SIR roll to the final roll. Where a final roll isn't in the record yet, only the draft measure can be shown.
Figures run to Sep 2026. Several final rolls were still pending then.
This is Assam's ordinary Special Revision, a different exercise from the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) run in the other states above -- it is not numbered as an SIR phase and 'phase' is left null. The final roll dropped 2,43,485 names between draft and final; final excludes 63,269 service voters, counted separately. Do not treat this as SIR phase data.
| TIER 3 · PRESS |
| — |
| Final roll | 2,49,58,139 | 2026-02-10 | Assam's Special Revision (not SIR): 2.43 lakh dropped between draft and final | TIER 3 · PRESS | — |
Every bar starts at zero. Differences are simple subtraction of the cited figures. A computed stage's method is in its note.
The Commission said statutory officers from BLOs to CEOs perform their functions on ECINET with unique IDs and passwords, that no other person, including any other Commission official, can perform those functions for them, and that the system is decentralised as the RP Acts require.
India TV's report was published at 00:00 IST on 25.09.2026, but both reports describe a statement made on Thursday 24.09.2026. Hans India attributes the ECINET part to unnamed ECI sources, so this is not confirmed as an on-record statement of the Commission. The statement was not found on eci.gov.in. It does not address specific cases such as the Goa rollback requests.