23 Sep 2026
Courts
Split opinion; challenge to 2023 Act sent to CJI for a Constitution BenchDocumentNot yet checked
No profile: this page lists the 5 entries that name Justice Satish Chandra Sharma.
BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya said the dissent was politically motivated and lacked merit, and accused the Congress of misreading the Supreme Court judgment. The BJP said no rules were broken and pointed to appointments of commissioners under Congress governments.
No formal response from the government or the Law Ministry was found.
The dissent turns on the change in the selection panel. The record documents the panel set by the Anoop Baranwal judgment until Parliament legislated (PM, Leader of Opposition, CJI) and the panel set by Section 7 of the 2023 Act (PM, Leader of Opposition, a Cabinet Minister nominated by the PM).
See all charges and answers →