14 May 2026
Neta·ResumeSpecial Intensive Revision, Phase III. 2 figures on record from Jul 2026 to Sep 2026.
| Stage | Electors | As of | Source | Tier | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draft roll | 4,50,282 | 2026-07-21 | Chandigarh final roll adds net 9,927 electors to 4,60,209 |
A draft roll is not the final roll — names still return through claims and appeals.
The draft roll is published after enumeration. Names left off it can come back through claims and objections, and new electors are added, before the final roll is published. So the share left off the draft is usually larger than the net change from the pre-SIR roll to the final roll. Where a final roll isn't in the record yet, only the draft measure can be shown.
Figures run to Sep 2026. Several final rolls were still pending then.
No pre-SIR 'before' figure for Chandigarh was found in the record.
| TIER 3 · PRESS |
| — |
| Final roll | 4,60,209 | 2026-09-22 | Chandigarh final roll adds net 9,927 electors to 4,60,209 | TIER 3 · PRESS | — |
Every bar starts at zero. Differences are simple subtraction of the cited figures. A computed stage's method is in its note.
The Indian Express reported that Election Commissioners Sandhu and Joshi formally objected at least 14 times over ten months to decisions and orders they said were taken without their knowledge, on new-voter registration, deletions and restorations, West Bengal appeals and custody of the roll database, copying CEC Gyanesh Kumar. The Commission and both Commissioners did not respond to questions sent on 21 September.
Not all 14 objections are itemised in the published reports; the rule-related ones are recorded in this file with their own entries.
The Commission's reply says its decisions were unanimous. Section 18 of the 2023 Act sets when unanimity is required and when a majority decides.
See all charges and answers →