Congress protests nationwide for CEC's resignation; Patnaik joins demand
No response on record.
Every charge set beside its reply, at equal weight, with what the record shows.
| Year | Answered | No response | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 2025 | 12 | 6 | 18 |
| 2026 | 10 | 17 | 27 |
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
No response on record.
In its reply to the stay applications, the Union of India set out the timeline from 1 February and said the selection meeting was moved from 15 to 14 March on 9 March, before the court listed the stay applications for 15 March. It said the Act was made as Article 324(2) contemplates.
The reply as recorded in the court's order does not address why names were circulated only on the day of the meeting.
The Union's reply was filed against a duplicate of this entry that has since been merged into it. The record documents Chowdhury's 12 March request for profiles and the Supreme Court's 21 March order, which refused a stay and commented on the selection procedure.